Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)

Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)On the open-weights frontier
Intelligence
8.90
Total cost
$14.7
Z AIGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.40
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)8.922.4+151.7% GLM-5.2 (Non-reasonin… is 2.5× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$14.68Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)57.75s3.88s−93.3% GLM-5.2 (Non-reasonin… is 93.3% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.02 / $0.10$1.40 / $4.40
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): what beats itGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/glm-5-2-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/glm-5-2-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill