Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs GPT-5.2 (Xhigh)

Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs GPT-5.2 (Xhigh). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)On the open-weights frontier
Intelligence
8.90
Total cost
$14.7
OpenAIGPT-5.2 (Xhigh)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
30.40
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)GPT-5.2 (Xhigh)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)8.930.4+241.6% GPT-5.2 (Xhigh) is 3.4× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$14.68Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)57.75s110.72s+91.7% GPT-5.2 (Xhigh) is 91.7% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.02 / $0.10$1.75 / $14.0
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): what beats itGPT-5.2 (Xhigh): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/gpt-5-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/gpt-5-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill