Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs GPT-6 Luna (High)
Which is better for the money: Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) by Google or GPT-6 Luna (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Luna (High) scores 24.0 points higher (32.9 vs 8.9) but costs 3.3× as much to run the benchmark ($47.9 vs $14.7; both budget class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Luna (High) when you need intelligence above 8.9, and Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) when 8.9 is enough.
| Metric | Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) | GPT-6 Luna (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 8.9 | 32.9 | +269.7% GPT-6 Luna (High) is 3.7× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $14.68 | $47.85 | +226.0% GPT-6 Luna (High) is 3.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 57.75s | 12.43s | −78.5% GPT-6 Luna (High) is 78.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.02 / $0.10 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Luna (High) vs Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): 269.7% more intelligence, 226.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 78.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- GPT-6 Luna (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)GPT-6 Luna (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/gpt-6-luna-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/gpt-6-luna-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill