Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs gpt-oss-120b (Low)

Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs gpt-oss-120b (Low). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)On the open-weights frontier
Intelligence
8.90
Total cost
$14.7
OpenAIgpt-oss-120b (Low)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
10.20
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)gpt-oss-120b (Low)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)8.910.2+14.6% gpt-oss-120b (Low) is 14.6% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$14.68Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)57.72s10.19s−82.3% gpt-oss-120b (Low) is 82.3% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.02 / $0.10$0.13 / $0.59
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): what beats itgpt-oss-120b (Low): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/gpt-oss-120b-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/gpt-oss-120b-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill