Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Granite 3.3 8B (Non-reasoning)

Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Granite 3.3 8B (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)On the open-weights frontier
Intelligence
8.90
Total cost
$14.7
IBMGranite 3.3 8B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
4.90
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)Granite 3.3 8B (Non-reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)8.94.9−44.9% Granite 3.3 8B (Non-r… is 44.9% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$14.68Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)57.75s25.43s−56.0% Granite 3.3 8B (Non-r… is 56.0% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.02 / $0.10$0.03 / $0.25
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): what beats itGranite 3.3 8B (Non-reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/granite-3-3-8b-instruct · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/granite-3-3-8b-instruct?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill