Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Grok 4.6 (medium)
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Grok 4.6 (medium). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) | Grok 4.6 (medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 8.9 | 43.0 | +383.1% Grok 4.6 (medium) is 4.8× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $1,936.75 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 61.26s | 39.69s | −35.2% Grok 4.6 (medium) is 35.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.02 / $0.10 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/grok-4-6-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/grok-4-6-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill