Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Grok 4.7 (High)
Which is better for the money: Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) by Google or Grok 4.7 (High) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (High) scores 37.4 points higher (46.3 vs 8.9) but costs 264× as much to run the benchmark ($3881 vs $14.7; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.7 (High) when you need intelligence above 8.9, and Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) when 8.9 is enough.
| Metric | Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) | Grok 4.7 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 8.9 | 46.3 | +420.2% Grok 4.7 (High) is 5.2× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $14.68 | $3,880.88 | +26336.5% Grok 4.7 (High) is 264× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 57.75s | 25.34s | −56.1% Grok 4.7 (High) is 56.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.02 / $0.10 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (High) vs Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): 420.2% more intelligence, 26336.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 56.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Grok 4.7 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)Grok 4.7 (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/grok-4-7-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/grok-4-7-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill