Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Grok Build 0.1 0616

Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Grok Build 0.1 0616. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)On the open-weights frontier
Intelligence
8.90
Total cost
$14.7
SpaceXAIGrok Build 0.1 0616Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
27.20
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)Grok Build 0.1 0616Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)8.927.2+205.6% Grok Build 0.1 0616 is 3.1× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$14.68Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)57.75s39.97s−30.8% Grok Build 0.1 0616 is 30.8% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.02 / $0.10$1.00 / $2.00
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): what beats itGrok Build 0.1 0616: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/grok-build-0-1-06-16 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/grok-build-0-1-06-16?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill