Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Kimi K2 Thinking

Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Kimi K2 Thinking. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)On the open-weights frontier
Intelligence
8.90
Total cost
$14.7
KimiKimi K2 ThinkingNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.00
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)Kimi K2 ThinkingDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)8.922.0+147.2% Kimi K2 Thinking is 2.5× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$14.68Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)57.75s22.51s−61.0% Kimi K2 Thinking is 61.0% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.02 / $0.10$0.60 / $2.50
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): what beats itKimi K2 Thinking: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/kimi-k2-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/kimi-k2-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill