Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Kimi K3 (Low)
Which is better for the money: Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) by Google or Kimi K3 (Low) by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3 (Low) scores 21.2 points higher (30.1 vs 8.9) but costs 81× as much to run the benchmark ($1190 vs $14.7; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K3 (Low) when you need intelligence above 8.9, and Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) when 8.9 is enough.
| Metric | Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) | Kimi K3 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 8.9 | 30.1 | +238.2% Kimi K3 (Low) is 3.4× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $14.68 | $1,190.42 | +8009.1% Kimi K3 (Low) is 81× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 57.75s | 66.33s | +14.9% Kimi K3 (Low) is 14.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.02 / $0.10 | $3.00 / $15.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Kimi K3 (Low) vs Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): 238.2% more intelligence, 8009.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 14.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Kimi K3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)Kimi K3 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/kimi-k3-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/kimi-k3-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill