Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Ling 3.0 Flash

Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Ling 3.0 Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)On the open-weights frontier
Intelligence
8.90
Total cost
$14.7
InclusionAILing 3.0 FlashNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
20.10
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)Ling 3.0 FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)8.920.1+125.8% Ling 3.0 Flash is 2.3× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$14.68Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)57.75s10.63s−81.6% Ling 3.0 Flash is 81.6% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.02 / $0.10$0.07 / $0.22
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): what beats itLing 3.0 Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/ling-3-0-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/ling-3-0-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill