Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)

Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)On the open-weights frontier
Intelligence
8.90
Total cost
$14.7
MetaLlama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
5.40
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)8.95.4−39.3% Llama 3.2 Instruct 11… is 39.3% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$14.68Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)57.75s22.01s−61.9% Llama 3.2 Instruct 11… is 61.9% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.02 / $0.10$0.34 / $0.34
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): what beats itLlama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/llama-3-2-instruct-11b-vision · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/llama-3-2-instruct-11b-vision?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill