Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Llama 65B

Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Llama 65B. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)On the open-weights frontier
Intelligence
8.90
Total cost
$14.7
MetaLlama 65BNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
5.00
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)Llama 65BDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)8.95.0−43.8% Llama 65B is 43.8% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$14.68Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)57.75sNot reported— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.02 / $0.10—
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): what beats itLlama 65B: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/llama-65b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/llama-65b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill