Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs MiniMax-M2

Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs MiniMax-M2. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)On the open-weights frontier
Intelligence
8.90
Total cost
$14.7
MiniMaxMiniMax-M2Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
18.60
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)MiniMax-M2Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)8.918.6+109.0% MiniMax-M2 is 2.1× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$14.68Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)57.75s26.19s−54.6% MiniMax-M2 is 54.6% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.02 / $0.10$0.30 / $1.20
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): what beats itMiniMax-M2: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/minimax-m2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/minimax-m2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill