Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Nova 2.0 Lite (High)

Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Nova 2.0 Lite (High). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)On the open-weights frontier
Intelligence
8.90
Total cost
$14.7
AmazonNova 2.0 Lite (High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
13.40
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)Nova 2.0 Lite (High)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)8.913.4+50.6% Nova 2.0 Lite (High) is 50.6% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$14.68Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)57.75s30.96s−46.4% Nova 2.0 Lite (High) is 46.4% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.02 / $0.10$0.30 / $2.50
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): what beats itNova 2.0 Lite (High): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/nova-2-0-lite-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/nova-2-0-lite-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill