Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Phi-4 Mini Instruct

Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Phi-4 Mini Instruct. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
8.90
Total cost
-
MicrosoftPhi-4 Mini InstructNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
6.30
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)Phi-4 Mini InstructDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)8.96.3−29.2% Phi-4 Mini Instruct is 29.2% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)55.37s11.82s−78.7% Phi-4 Mini Instruct is 78.7% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.02 / $0.10$0.00 / $0.00
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): what beats itPhi-4 Mini Instruct: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/phi-4-mini · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/phi-4-mini?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill