Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)

Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)On the open-weights frontier
Intelligence
8.90
Total cost
$14.7
AlibabaQwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
19.40
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)8.919.4+118.0% Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reas… is 2.2× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$14.68Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)55.59s11.79s−78.8% Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reas… is 78.8% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.02 / $0.10$0.30 / $2.40
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): what beats itQwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/qwen3-5-27b-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/qwen3-5-27b-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill