Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Tri-21B-Think

Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Tri-21B-Think. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)On the open-weights frontier
Intelligence
8.90
Total cost
$14.7
Trillion LabsTri-21B-ThinkNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
9.00
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)Tri-21B-ThinkDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)8.99.0+1.1% Tri-21B-Think is 1.1% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$14.68Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)57.75sNot reported— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.02 / $0.10—
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): what beats itTri-21B-Think: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/tri-21b-think-v0-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/tri-21b-think-v0-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill