GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning) vs Mistral Small 3.2

GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning) vs Mistral Small 3.2. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
6.70
Total cost
-
MistralMistral Small 3.2Off the frontier
Intelligence
7.00
Total cost
$122
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)Mistral Small 3.2Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)6.77.0+4.5% Mistral Small 3.2 is 4.5% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$121.78— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)10.83s12.77s+17.9% Mistral Small 3.2 is 17.9% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.60 / $1.80$0.07 / $0.20
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning): what beats itMistral Small 3.2: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-5v/mistral-small-3-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-5v/mistral-small-3-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill