GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
6.70
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3.8-Flash-NextOff the frontier
Intelligence
39.80
Total cost
$363
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)Qwen3.8-Flash-NextDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)6.739.8+494.0% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 5.9× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$362.72— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)10.96s50.57s+361.4% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 361.4% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.60 / $1.80$0.15 / $0.47
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Video
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning): what beats itQwen3.8-Flash-Next: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-5v/qwen3-8-flash-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-5v/qwen3-8-flash-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill