GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) vs GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh)

GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) vs GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.6 (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
18.50
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh)Off the frontier
Intelligence
24.10
Total cost
$1524
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.6 (Reasoning)GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)18.524.1+30.3% GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is 30.3% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$1,524.02— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)78.88s115.75s+46.7% GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is 46.7% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.55 / $2.20$0.75 / $4.50
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.6 (Reasoning): what beats itGPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6-reasoning/gpt-5-4-mini · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6-reasoning/gpt-5-4-mini?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill