GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) vs GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)

GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) vs GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.6 (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
18.50
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)Off the frontier
Intelligence
20.70
Total cost
$331
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.6 (Reasoning)GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)18.520.7+11.9% GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is 11.9% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$331.24— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)79.13s69.42s−12.3% GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is 12.3% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.55 / $2.20$0.20 / $1.25
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.6 (Reasoning): what beats itGPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6-reasoning/gpt-5-4-nano · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6-reasoning/gpt-5-4-nano?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill