GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium)

GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.6 (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
18.50
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-6.1 Sol (Medium)On the frontier
Intelligence
47.80
Total cost
$361
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.6 (Reasoning)GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)18.547.8+158.4% GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) is 2.6× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$361.37— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)78.88s13.88s−82.4% GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) is 82.4% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.55 / $2.20$2.00 / $10.0
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.6 (Reasoning): what beats itGPT-6.1 Sol (Medium): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6-reasoning/gpt-6-1-sol-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6-reasoning/gpt-6-1-sol-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill