GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) vs gpt-oss-120b (High)

GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) vs gpt-oss-120b (High). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.6 (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
18.50
Total cost
-
OpenAIgpt-oss-120b (High)Off the frontier
Intelligence
11.60
Total cost
$123
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.6 (Reasoning)gpt-oss-120b (High)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)18.511.6−37.3% gpt-oss-120b (High) is 37.3% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$122.71— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)79.13s11.44s−85.5% gpt-oss-120b (High) is 85.5% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.55 / $2.20$0.15 / $0.60
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.6 (Reasoning): what beats itgpt-oss-120b (High): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6-reasoning/gpt-oss-120b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6-reasoning/gpt-oss-120b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill