GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) vs Mercury 2.5

GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) vs Mercury 2.5. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.6 (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
18.50
Total cost
-
InceptionMercury 2.5Off the frontier
Intelligence
12.30
Total cost
$218
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.6 (Reasoning)Mercury 2.5Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)18.512.3−33.5% Mercury 2.5 is 33.5% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$218.11— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)78.88s4.32s−94.5% Mercury 2.5 is 94.5% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.55 / $2.20$0.25 / $0.75
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.6 (Reasoning): what beats itMercury 2.5: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6-reasoning/mercury-2-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6-reasoning/mercury-2-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill