GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) vs Mistral Small 3.2

GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) vs Mistral Small 3.2. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.6 (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
18.50
Total cost
-
MistralMistral Small 3.2Off the frontier
Intelligence
7.00
Total cost
$122
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.6 (Reasoning)Mistral Small 3.2Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)18.57.0−62.2% Mistral Small 3.2 is 62.2% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$121.78— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)79.51s12.50s−84.3% Mistral Small 3.2 is 84.3% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.55 / $2.20$0.07 / $0.20
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.6 (Reasoning): what beats itMistral Small 3.2: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6-reasoning/mistral-small-3-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6-reasoning/mistral-small-3-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill