GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) vs Phi-4 Mini Instruct

GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) vs Phi-4 Mini Instruct. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.6 (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
18.50
Total cost
-
MicrosoftPhi-4 Mini InstructNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
6.30
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.6 (Reasoning)Phi-4 Mini InstructDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)18.56.3−65.9% Phi-4 Mini Instruct is 65.9% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)79.51s11.81s−85.1% Phi-4 Mini Instruct is 85.1% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.55 / $2.20$0.07 / $0.30
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.6 (Reasoning): what beats itPhi-4 Mini Instruct: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6-reasoning/phi-4-mini · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6-reasoning/phi-4-mini?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill