GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 32B (Non-reasoning)

GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 32B (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.6 (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
18.50
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3 32B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.30
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.6 (Reasoning)Qwen3 32B (Non-reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)18.57.3−60.5% Qwen3 32B (Non-reason… is 60.5% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)79.40s9.70s−87.8% Qwen3 32B (Non-reason… is 87.8% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.55 / $2.20$0.15 / $0.60
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.6 (Reasoning): what beats itQwen3 32B (Non-reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6-reasoning/qwen3-32b-instruct · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6-reasoning/qwen3-32b-instruct?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill