GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.8 Max

GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.8 Max. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.6 (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
18.50
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3.8 MaxOff the frontier
Intelligence
40.20
Total cost
$3172
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.6 (Reasoning)Qwen3.8 MaxDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)18.540.2+117.3% Qwen3.8 Max is 2.2× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$3,172.37— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)79.13s64.17s−18.9% Qwen3.8 Max is 18.9% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.55 / $2.20$2.00 / $6.00
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Video
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.6 (Reasoning): what beats itQwen3.8 Max: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6-reasoning/qwen3-8-max-0803 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6-reasoning/qwen3-8-max-0803?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill