GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning) vs GLM-4.6V (Reasoning)

GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning) vs GLM-4.6V (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
14.90
Total cost
-
Z AIGLM-4.6V (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
11.20
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning)GLM-4.6V (Reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)14.911.2−24.8% GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) is 24.8% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)19.63s33.38s+70.0% GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) is 70.0% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.57 / $2.20$0.30 / $0.90
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning): what beats itGLM-4.6V (Reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6/glm-4-6v-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6/glm-4-6v-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill