GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-5.2 (Xhigh)

GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-5.2 (Xhigh). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
14.90
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-5.2 (Xhigh)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
30.40
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning)GPT-5.2 (Xhigh)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)14.930.4+104.0% GPT-5.2 (Xhigh) is 2.0× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)19.63s94.34s+380.6% GPT-5.2 (Xhigh) is 380.6% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.57 / $2.20$1.75 / $14.0
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning): what beats itGPT-5.2 (Xhigh): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6/gpt-5-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6/gpt-5-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill