GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-5.5 (High)

GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-5.5 (High). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
14.90
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-5.5 (High)Off the frontier
Intelligence
37.00
Total cost
$3411
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning)GPT-5.5 (High)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)14.937.0+148.3% GPT-5.5 (High) is 2.5× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$3,410.76— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)19.99s19.79s−1.0% GPT-5.5 (High) is 1.0% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.57 / $2.20$5.00 / $30.0
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning): what beats itGPT-5.5 (High): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6/gpt-5-5-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6/gpt-5-5-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill