GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-5.6 Luna (Low)

GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-5.6 Luna (Low). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
14.90
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-5.6 Luna (Low)Off the frontier
Intelligence
21.00
Total cost
$27.0
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning)GPT-5.6 Luna (Low)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)14.921.0+40.9% GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) is 40.9% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$27.02— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)19.51s5.84s−70.1% GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) is 70.1% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.57 / $2.20$0.20 / $1.20
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning): what beats itGPT-5.6 Luna (Low): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6/gpt-5-6-luna-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6/gpt-5-6-luna-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill