GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh)

GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
14.90
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh)On the frontier
Intelligence
51.00
Total cost
$662
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning)GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)14.951.0+242.3% GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is 3.4× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$662.28— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)19.99s86.31s+331.8% GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is 331.8% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.57 / $2.20$2.00 / $10.0
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning): what beats itGPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6/gpt-6-1-sol-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6/gpt-6-1-sol-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill