GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning) vs Granite 4.2 3B

GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning) vs Granite 4.2 3B. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
14.90
Total cost
-
IBMGranite 4.2 3BOn the open-weights frontier
Intelligence
9.10
Total cost
$14.9
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning)Granite 4.2 3BDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)14.99.1−38.9% Granite 4.2 3B is 38.9% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$14.91— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)19.63s49.42s+151.8% Granite 4.2 3B is 151.8% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.57 / $2.20$0.03 / $0.12
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning): what beats itGranite 4.2 3B: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6/granite-4-2-3b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6/granite-4-2-3b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill