GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning) vs Grok 4.6 (High)

GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning) vs Grok 4.6 (High). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
14.90
Total cost
-
SpaceXAIGrok 4.6 (High)Off the frontier
Intelligence
44.30
Total cost
$1963
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning)Grok 4.6 (High)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)14.944.3+197.3% Grok 4.6 (High) is 3.0× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$1,962.90— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)19.29s34.90s+80.9% Grok 4.6 (High) is 80.9% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.57 / $2.20$2.00 / $6.00
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning): what beats itGrok 4.6 (High): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6/grok-4-6 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6/grok-4-6?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill