GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning) vs Grok 4.6 (Medium)
GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning) vs Grok 4.6 (Medium). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning) | Grok 4.6 (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 14.9 | 42.8 | +187.2% Grok 4.6 (Medium) is 2.9× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $1,557.04 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 19.63s | 31.37s | +59.8% Grok 4.6 (Medium) is 59.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.57 / $2.20 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6/grok-4-6-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6/grok-4-6-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill