GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning) vs K2 Horizon 0.9B

GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning) vs K2 Horizon 0.9B. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
14.90
Total cost
-
Institute of Foundation ModelsK2 Horizon 0.9BNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
3.00
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning)K2 Horizon 0.9BDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)14.93.0−79.9% K2 Horizon 0.9B is 79.9% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)19.51sNot reported— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.57 / $2.20—
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning): what beats itK2 Horizon 0.9B: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6/k2-horizon-0-9b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6/k2-horizon-0-9b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill