GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning) vs Muse Wonder (Max)
GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning) vs Muse Wonder (Max). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning) | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 14.9 | 52.4 | +251.7% Muse Wonder (Max) is 3.5× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $5,786.78 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 19.63s | 40.70s | +107.3% Muse Wonder (Max) is 107.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.57 / $2.20 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill