GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3.7 Max

GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3.7 Max. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
14.90
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3.7 MaxOff the frontier
Intelligence
29.50
Total cost
$2277
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning)Qwen3.7 MaxDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)14.929.5+98.0% Qwen3.7 Max is 98.0% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$2,277.12— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)19.63s16.67s−15.1% Qwen3.7 Max is 15.1% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.57 / $2.20$2.50 / $7.50
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning): what beats itQwen3.7 Max: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill