GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
14.90
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3.8 Max (0902)Off the frontier
Intelligence
45.40
Total cost
$4935
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning)Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)14.945.4+204.7% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 3.0× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$4,934.79— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)19.63s65.39s+233.1% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 233.1% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.57 / $2.20$2.00 / $6.00
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning): what beats itQwen3.8 Max (0902): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6/qwen3-8-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6/qwen3-8-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill