GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) vs GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh)

GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) vs GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.6V (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
11.20
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-6 Astra (Xhigh)Off the frontier
Intelligence
52.40
Total cost
$3803
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.6V (Reasoning)GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)11.252.4+367.9% GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) is 4.7× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$3,802.98— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)32.68s163.27s+399.6% GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) is 399.6% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.30 / $0.90$10.0 / $50.0
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.6V (Reasoning): what beats itGPT-6 Astra (Xhigh): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6v-reasoning/gpt-6-astra-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6v-reasoning/gpt-6-astra-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill