GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) vs Magistral Small 1.2

GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) vs Magistral Small 1.2. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.6V (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
11.20
Total cost
-
MistralMagistral Small 1.2Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
8.60
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.6V (Reasoning)Magistral Small 1.2Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)11.28.6−23.2% Magistral Small 1.2 is 23.2% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)32.68s34.22s+4.7% Magistral Small 1.2 is 4.7% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.30 / $0.90$0.50 / $1.50
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.6V (Reasoning): what beats itMagistral Small 1.2: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6v-reasoning/magistral-small-2509 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6v-reasoning/magistral-small-2509?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill