GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning)
GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) | Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.2 | 13.3 | +18.8% Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reaso… is 18.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 32.68s | 7.16s | −78.1% Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reaso… is 78.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $0.90 | $0.17 / $0.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6v-reasoning/qwen3-5-9b-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6v-reasoning/qwen3-5-9b-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill