GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 Coder Next

GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 Coder Next. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.6V (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
11.20
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3 Coder NextOff the frontier
Intelligence
9.20
Total cost
$405
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.6V (Reasoning)Qwen3 Coder NextDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)11.29.2−17.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 17.9% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$405.10— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)32.68s6.44s−80.3% Qwen3 Coder Next is 80.3% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.30 / $0.90$0.31 / $1.00
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.6V (Reasoning): what beats itQwen3 Coder Next: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6v-reasoning/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6v-reasoning/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill