GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) vs GLM-4.7 (Reasoning)

GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) vs GLM-4.7 (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
8.40
Total cost
-
Z AIGLM-4.7 (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.20
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)GLM-4.7 (Reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)8.422.2+164.3% GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) is 2.6× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)9.38s71.61s+663.4% GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) is 663.4% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.30 / $0.90$0.53 / $2.10
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning): what beats itGLM-4.7 (Reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6v/glm-4-7 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6v/glm-4-7?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill