GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-3.5 Turbo

GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-3.5 Turbo. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
8.40
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-3.5 TurboNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
5.50
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)GPT-3.5 TurboDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)8.45.5−34.5% GPT-3.5 Turbo is 34.5% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)9.86sNot reported— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.30 / $0.90$0.50 / $1.50
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning): what beats itGPT-3.5 Turbo: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6v/gpt-35-turbo · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6v/gpt-35-turbo?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill