GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) vs Grok 4.5 (High)

GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) vs Grok 4.5 (High). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
8.40
Total cost
-
SpaceXAIGrok 4.5 (High)Off the frontier
Intelligence
38.80
Total cost
$1244
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)Grok 4.5 (High)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)8.438.8+361.9% Grok 4.5 (High) is 4.6× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$1,243.85— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)9.38s18.82s+100.6% Grok 4.5 (High) is 100.6% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.30 / $0.90$2.00 / $6.00
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning): what beats itGrok 4.5 (High): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6v/grok-4-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6v/grok-4-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill