GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) vs Grok 4.7 (High)

GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) vs Grok 4.7 (High). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
8.40
Total cost
-
SpaceXAIGrok 4.7 (High)Off the frontier
Intelligence
46.30
Total cost
$3881
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)Grok 4.7 (High)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)8.446.3+451.2% Grok 4.7 (High) is 5.5× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$3,880.88— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)9.06s25.34s+179.7% Grok 4.7 (High) is 179.7% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.30 / $0.90$2.00 / $6.00
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning): what beats itGrok 4.7 (High): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6v/grok-4-7-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6v/grok-4-7-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill