GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) vs MiniMax-M2.1

GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) vs MiniMax-M2.1. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
8.40
Total cost
-
MiniMaxMiniMax-M2.1Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
20.90
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)MiniMax-M2.1Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)8.420.9+148.8% MiniMax-M2.1 is 2.5× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)9.86s40.62s+312.0% MiniMax-M2.1 is 312.0% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.30 / $0.90$0.30 / $1.20
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning): what beats itMiniMax-M2.1: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6v/minimax-m2-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6v/minimax-m2-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill